Multibacillary leprosy with an incubation period exceeding 50 years
- 1 Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
- 2 Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- Correspondence to Dr Michael Taggart; michael.taggart@health.wa.gov.au
Abstract
Leprosy is a chronic granulomatous infection predominantly involving the skin and peripheral nervous system. The condition is caused by infection with the obligate intracellular bacillus Mycobacterium leprae and the clinical phenotype is largely dependent on the host immune response to the organism. Transmission is suspected to occur via respiratory secretions with infection usually requiring prolonged periods of contact. The incubation period is highly variable with disease manifestations appearing up to several decades after the initial exposure. The disease can be broadly divided into ‘paucibacillary’ and ‘multibacillary’, and treatment with multidrug therapy including dapsone, clofazimine and rifampicin offers high rates of cure. Here, we report of a case of leprosy with a suspected incubation period in excess of 50 years following occupational exposure in rural Australia. To our knowledge, this incubation period is the longest reported to date.
Background
The incidence of leprosy has slowly declined over the last decade; however, there were still more than 200 000 cases reported globally in 2018.1 While uncommon in Australia, leprosy disproportionately affects Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and migrants from leprosy endemic regions. These two populations comprised 95% of new cases in the most recent national data set.2 Consequently, a diagnosis of leprosy may be overlooked outside this demographic. Nonetheless, early recognition is important as effective antimicrobial therapy can eradicate the infection and prevent irreversible neurological disability.
Case presentation
A retired Caucasian man was admitted under the neurology team for the investigation of multiple mononeuropathies. His medical history included type 2 diabetes that was well controlled with a glycated haemoglobin of 4.8%, ischaemic heart disease with a previous non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the setting of a 60-pack year history of smoking and peripheral vascular disease. The patient had previously worked within the local government sector in rural Australia. Between 1964 and 1967, the patient supervised a rural public swimming pool that was used monthly by the local leprosarium. The patient swam in the pool and made use of the facilities on a number of these occasions. He had never lived or worked overseas.
In 2019, the patient developed a slowly progressive left foot drop, which worsened over a period of 6 months. He subsequently developed sensory loss in the left foot, which extended to involve the entire limb below the knee. He underwent nerve conduction studies which were consistent with a severe common peroneal nerve neuropathy at the fibular head.
Over the next 12 months, the patient developed a right foot drop with associated sensory loss to the level of the mid-shin. Approximately 21 months after the onset of his initial neurological symptoms, the patient noticed the appearance of multiple non-tender, non-pruritic macules and patches affecting the trunk and all four limbs. Following this, he developed weakness in the left hand with sensory loss in the fourth and fifth digits extending up to the elbow as well as left ear lobe and neck numbness.
At the time of his hospital admission, the patient had profound wasting of the left dorsal interossei with weakness of the second to fourth digits in abduction, adduction, flexion and extension. Thumb abduction and flexion were weak. This was clinically consistent with involvement of the median, ulnar and to a lesser degree radial nerve. There was loss of sensation in a left ulnar nerve distribution. Both ulnar nerves were thickened and palpable at the elbow. Right upper limb neurological examination was otherwise normal. He had bilateral lower limb weakness with absent movement in all planes at the ankles. There was loss of pinprick sensation, proprioception and vibration sense below the level of the knee on the right, and below the level of the groin on the left. The latter finding in the left leg was consistent with a sensory neuropathy involving the sciatic trunk, cutaneous femoral and lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh. He had a high stepping gait and required a four-wheeled walker to mobilise. The patient also had reduced pinprick sensation in the left greater auricular nerve. This finding, in addition to more profound sensory loss distally in the lower limbs, was consistent with a predilection for sites with lower local temperatures. As seen in figure 1 and figure 2, he had a diffuse rash with patches and macules affecting the trunk and all four limbs. Individual lesions were not hypoanaesthetic, nor were they tender. There were no subcutaneous nodules. There was no madarosis, lagophthalmos, reduced corneal sensation or signs of exposure keratitis.
Erythematous macules and patches affecting the trunk of the described patient with multibacillary leprosy.
Magnification of the rash over the left flank showing macules and patches.
Investigations
Initial investigations revealed a mild normocytic anaemia with a haemoglobin of 120 g/L. White cell count, renal function, liver function, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein, complement 3/4 and immunoglobulins were normal. Subsequent investigations, including ACE levels, paraprotein screen and vasculitic screen, were normal. Nerve conduction studies showed distally predominant, multiple mononeuropathies in all four limbs, including bilateral ulnar nerves at the elbow, proximal left median nerve, bilateral common peroneal nerves, bilateral tibial nerves, bilateral sural nerves and subclinical bilateral radial nerve involvement. Representative waveforms from the nerve conduction studies are shown in figure 3 and figure 4. A punch biopsy of a lesion on the left thigh revealed granulomatous dermatitis without necrosis. A chest radiograph showed no parenchymal lesions or features of pulmonary sarcoidosis.
The left median motor response measured over abductor pollicis brevis, demonstrating reduced compound muscle action potential amplitude at 3.4 mV (normal value >5 mV) and slowed conduction at 46.9 m/s (normal value >50 m/s). Top trace showing response with stimulation at the wrist, bottom trace showing response with stimulation at the elbow. X-axis time in ms, Y-axis amplitude in mV.
The right radial sensory response measured over the anatomical snuff box, demonstrating reduced sensory amplitude at 4.7 µV (normal >15 µV), which also appears dispersed. X-axis time in ms, Y-axis amplitude in µV.
The patient proceeded to have biopsies of his left sural nerve, left peroneus brevis muscle and left lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh. Both nerve specimens showed florid granulomatous inflammation with acid fast bacilli seen within foamy macrophages. Representative microscopy is shown in figure 5. A real-time PCR assay targeting a region of the rpoB gene of Mycobacterium leprae was positive. This was subsequently performed on the skin biopsy and also returned a positive result. The left sural nerve bacterial index was 2+ (1–10 bacilli per 10 high-powered fields). The morphological index was estimated at 17%. No recognised resistance mutations were detected in the rpoB, folP1 and gyrA genes.
Homogenised nerve biopsy specimen with a modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain (decolourisation step with 1% hydrochloric acid in 70% alcohol) showing a cluster of acid fast bacilli (arrow) viewed under 1000x oil immersion bright field microscopy.
Treatment
The patient was commenced on the WHO multidrug therapy regimen for multibacillary leprosy with clofazimine 50 mg/day, dapsone 100 mg/day, rifampicin 600 mg monthly and an additional clofazimine 300 mg monthly. The patient was provided with a case manager from the local public health unit who administered the monthly doses as directly observed therapy. Current and previous household contacts were referred to the public health unit for assessment and consideration of single-dose rifampicin chemoprophylaxis. The patient underwent a 3-week period of intensive inpatient rehabilitation with input from physiotherapy, occupational therapy and social work. He was fitted with bilateral orthoses for footdrop and was discharged with rehabilitation in the home services.
Outcome and follow-up
At the time of writing, the patient had completed 9 months of a planned 12-month treatment course with unchanged sensorimotor deficits relative to baseline. The patient’s progress was complicated by a type 1 reaction 1–2 months into therapy manifesting as symptomatic neuritis and new cutaneous lesions. Motor and sensory impairment remained stable. He was commenced on prednisolone 50 mg/day with significant improvement in symptoms and without further progression of established impairment. Prednisolone was gradually tapered over a 6-month period.
Discussion
The period between infection with Mycobacterium leprae and the development of clinical symptoms is reported to be up to several decades. Early studies have estimated that the median incubation period for tuberculoid disease is 2–5 years, while for lepromatous disease, it is 8–12 years.3 Multiple factors may contribute to this protracted incubation period, including the long 2-week doubling time of the organism, low virulence, early subclinical disease and temporal changes in the host immunological response to the organism.4 The latter is known to significantly influence disease phenotype with tuberculoid disease associated with strong T-helper 1 cell responses and poor antibody production, and lepromatous disease associated with robust T-helper 2 cell responses and high levels of antibody production.5 Conversely, host resistance to infection appears to be strongly influenced by genetic factors related to the innate immune response.6
Despite this, there is a paucity of published data to support the prolonged incubation period. Generating reliable data from leprosy endemic regions are challenging given the ongoing risk of re-exposure and uncertainty in determining the time of initial infection. Instead, among migrants from leprosy endemic areas, the time between relocation to a country in which leprosy has been eliminated to the onset of symptoms may provide an estimate of the shortest possible incubation period (assuming that local transmission has not occurred in the country of relocation). One retrospective review of cases in the UK found that the longest time between migration from a leprosy endemic region to the onset of disease was 47.8 years.7 Prior to the case, we have described, this is the longest incubation period reported in the literature to date. Given the restricted epidemiological profile of leprosy in Australia, our case exceeds this by providing evidence for a minimum incubation period of 52 years. Other case series from the UK,8 Denmark9 and New York City10 found maximum incubation periods of 18, 20 and 38 years, respectively.
In non-endemic countries, this long period of latency may make it difficult for clinicians to consider a diagnosis of leprosy in patients presenting with compatible symptoms. One retrospective cohort study in the USA found a median delay of 12 months (range 1–96),11 in keeping with the approximate 24-month delay in our case. Minimising this delay is critical in preventing disability, with one study showing that a delay in commencing multidrug therapy was associated with significantly increased odds of disability.12 While inflammatory neuritis can continue to occur for years after successful antimicrobial therapy, untreated disease may provide long periods of opportunity for infected Schwann cells to drive inflammation and demyelination with the cumulative acquisition of nerve function impairment.
While global progress towards eliminating leprosy has been significant, much of the disease pathophysiology remains poorly understood. The inability to culture Mycobacterium leprae in vitro has hampered efforts to understand the complex microbe-immunological interface and the mechanisms behind its prolonged incubation period. This case report provides evidence for the longest incubation period reported in the literature to date—in excess of 50 years. While it is possible that the patient we have described was infected at a later point in time, this was considered unlikely in the absence of epidemiological risk factors after 1967. Additionally, while the patient may have had earlier mild symptoms that went unrecognised, this was deemed less likely in an educated individual with good health literacy. In an era of declining incidence, clinicians need to consider leprosy in patients presenting with the combination of neuropathy and rash, even when an exposure risk is not immediately apparent.
Learning points
-
Leprosy should be considered in patients presenting with the combination of neuropathy and rash.
-
The incubation period of leprosy can be over 50 years.
-
Early recognition of leprosy is essential in preventing disability.
-
A detailed occupational history can provide critical clues in the generation of differential diagnoses for challenging cases
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Acknowledgments
Dr Hannah Gooding and Ms Terillee Keehner for providing microscopy images.
Footnotes
-
Contributors MT drafted the initial manuscript. AK, RS and EC reviewed and edited the manuscript.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer